AI agents in your industry
Pharma
Help quality teams reach the review with the records ready.
A missing reference can hold up a review. See how agents can prepare quality packs and materials requests, with qualified people responsible for the decisions that matter.
Related customer story · Automotive
From a quality issue to a clear decision.
How an automotive customer is bringing quality evidence, cost analysis and corrective-action decisions into one review.
- Quality & cost
- Named approvals
- Decision evidence
Novagentica in action
Work your team will recognise.
Explore what could change in the work, and which decisions your people keep.
Example · Quality review
The quality team is ready to review. Are the records?
Bring the references and open questions together before the decision.
The situation
A quality review needs information from several records and versions. Missing references create extra rounds of checking before the responsible person can assess the pack.
With Novagentica
An agent assembles the review pack from permitted records and flags missing information for the owner. Sources and versions stay attached, so the reviewer can examine the information behind the summary.
From the signal to the result
The starting point
Permitted quality records gathered
Within agreed rules
Versions & completeness checked
Within agreed rules
Authorised reviewer decides
The result
Decision & follow-up recorded
The result is checked
References, document versions, reviewer decisions and follow-up actions are checked in the record.
The review can focus on the quality question, with the evidence and outstanding information visible.
Example · Materials procurement
A material is needed. Its approval status comes with it.
Keep replenishment tied to approved specifications and suppliers.
The situation
A materials need cannot be treated as a product name and quantity alone. The request also needs the approved supplier, specification and status information, with a clear route for an exception.
With Novagentica
An agent prepares an order using that approved information and checks quantity and spending limits. A substitution or status exception is sent to the designated owner before it proceeds.
From the signal to the result
The starting point
Materials need received
Within agreed rules
Supplier, specification & status checked
Business Authority
Order proceeds or exception reviewed
Business Authority
Recorded order compared with approval
The result is checked
The order is compared with the authorised material, supplier, quantity and specification reference.
Routine requests can progress while material and supplier exceptions receive the right review.
Example · Agent improvement
Before the next release, see what the agent needs to improve.
Give the responsible team evidence about a specific version.
The situation
A document or quality-support agent may perform well in a demonstration. The team still needs to understand how it handles representative tasks and whether the controls match its intended role.
With Novagentica
The benchmarks compare the agent with agreed evaluation criteria. Findings become corrective actions with owners and acceptance criteria. The revised agent is retested, keeping the results tied to that version.
From the signal to the result
The starting point
Representative tasks agreed
Within agreed rules
Agent & controls benchmarked
Within agreed rules
Improvements applied
The result
Specific version retested & reviewed
The result is checked
The agent version, evaluation cases, retest results and review evidence are retained together.
The release decision can be based on the work the agent was tested to do and the gaps that remain.
Already using agents?
Find out where they need work.
Start with an assessment of their controls or what they need to be more useful.
START WITH YOUR BUSINESS
Let’s look at a task in your business.
Bring an agent you already use or a task you want to improve. We’ll work through the rules, systems and result checks it would need.