EU AI Act
Start with the intended use.
Review the agent’s purpose, risk classification and relevant duties, including human oversight, transparency and records.
Agent Governance Benchmark
Assess your agents against any regulation or policy—from the EU AI Act and regional requirements to industry standards and your own company rules. See the gaps, the evidence behind each finding and what to fix.
The right rules for the right agent
Use any regulation, standard or company policy your business needs to assess. Apply it in the context of the agent’s job, industry and the places it operates, then turn the findings into practical next steps.
EU AI Act
Review the agent’s purpose, risk classification and relevant duties, including human oversight, transparency and records.
Regional regulations
Bring the requirements of the countries and markets involved into the review, alongside the agent’s data and decisions.
Industry requirements
Assess the relevant sector rules, standards and oversight expectations against the task the agent is meant to perform.
Your company policies
Review decision rights, data access, financial limits, approval routes and internal policies in the same assessment.
See the rule behind a finding, the evidence available, what needs to change and who owns the next step.
The control benchmark
Which agent is running, who owns it and what the assessment covers.
Define its Business Authority: what the agent may decide and do, its limits and when it must stop or ask a person.
The information it needs and the records it may change.
Who approves exceptions and how someone can intervene.
What was requested, what was approved and what the system recorded.
Tests for the current version and any proposed changes.
What the benchmark delivers
See the agents, versions and owners available through your connected platforms. Missing information stays visible.
Review the rules, permissions, approvals and records behind each agent. See what is confirmed and what still needs checking.
Agree which fixes matter most, who owns them and how to test them. Update the plan as agents change.
Clear findings
| Benchmark findings | What it tells you |
|---|---|
| Material exposure | Evidence supports a significant control gap. Review the affected action before expanding its responsibility. |
| Remediation needed | A specific gap is supported within the assessed scope. The recommendation explains what to change and how to validate it. |
| Controls supported | The checked controls are supported for the stated scope, version and evidence window. |
| More evidence needed | Access, context or behavioural proof is incomplete. The uncertainty stays visible. |
Company policy · Purchasing agent
See new agents, changed versions and updated findings, with the changes since the last assessment.
Share the agent list, findings and supporting records with the people who need to act.
Get specific recommendations for the agreed scope. Then decide who will carry out the work.
The output
An overview shows where to focus. Open a finding to see its evidence and the next decision.
The benchmark gives your team the findings and improvement plan. Your team or a delivery partner implements the changes. With the Novagentica platform, they can test, review and redeploy the approved version, then check its actions and recorded results.
Explore the full platform ↗Tell us which platforms you use and what you need to understand. We’ll confirm what the assessment can cover.